TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of written guides to empower breast cancer survivors in their management of chronic pain
T2 - A realist evaluation
AU - Slaghmuylder, Yaël
AU - Maingi, Lydiah
AU - Pype, Peter
AU - Lauwerier, Emelien
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Many breast cancer survivors experience long-term complaints following treatment, such as pain, which are often not addressed in a sufficient way. To empower survivors in talking about their pain and related complaints and in searching for appropriate support when needed, we developed two written guides. With this study, we aimed to pilot test the guides and gain insight into the implementation process and influencing mechanisms through the perspective of a realist evaluation.METHODS: Nine survivors were interviewed at two time points (i.e., post-intervention and at three-month follow-up). The data were thematically analysed and categorized into a context-implementation-mechanisms-outcomes hypothesis.RESULTS: The guides empowered the participants to discuss pain with medical specialists and initiate support-seeking behaviour through underlying mechanisms such as awareness, acknowledgment, hope, reduced isolation, and motivation. Nonetheless, mechanisms and outcomes differed according to a survivor's unique context.CONCLUSION: Written guides can offer a feasible way to empower survivors in their management of chronic pain. However, a one-size-fits-all approach is not desirable and other strategies might be necessary.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is pivotal to engage survivors as well as professionals in adopting new interventions. As such, the role of nurses in introducing and endorsing the guides should be further explored.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Many breast cancer survivors experience long-term complaints following treatment, such as pain, which are often not addressed in a sufficient way. To empower survivors in talking about their pain and related complaints and in searching for appropriate support when needed, we developed two written guides. With this study, we aimed to pilot test the guides and gain insight into the implementation process and influencing mechanisms through the perspective of a realist evaluation.METHODS: Nine survivors were interviewed at two time points (i.e., post-intervention and at three-month follow-up). The data were thematically analysed and categorized into a context-implementation-mechanisms-outcomes hypothesis.RESULTS: The guides empowered the participants to discuss pain with medical specialists and initiate support-seeking behaviour through underlying mechanisms such as awareness, acknowledgment, hope, reduced isolation, and motivation. Nonetheless, mechanisms and outcomes differed according to a survivor's unique context.CONCLUSION: Written guides can offer a feasible way to empower survivors in their management of chronic pain. However, a one-size-fits-all approach is not desirable and other strategies might be necessary.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is pivotal to engage survivors as well as professionals in adopting new interventions. As such, the role of nurses in introducing and endorsing the guides should be further explored.
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108129
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108129
M3 - Article
C2 - 38181590
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 120
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
M1 - 108129
ER -