To whom and why should I connect? Co-author Recommendation based on powerful and similar Peers

Rory L.L. Sie, Hendrik Drachsler, Marlies Bitter-Rijpkema, Peter Sloep

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The present article offers preliminary outcomes of a user study that investigated the acceptance of a recommender system that suggests future co- authors for scientific article writing. The recommendation approach is twofold: network information (betweenness centrality) and author (keyword) similarity are used to compute the utility of peers in a network of co-authors. Two sets of recommendations were provided to the participants: Set one focused on all candidate authors, including co-authors of a target user to strengthen current bonds and strive for acceptance of a certain research topic. Set two focused on solely new co-authors of a target user to foster creativity, excluding current co- authors. A small-scale evaluation suggests that the utility-based recommendation approach is promising, but to maximize outcome, we need to 1) compensate for researchers’ interests that change over time, and 2) account for multi-person co-authored papers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)121-137
    Number of pages17
    JournalInternational Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (IJTEL)
    Volume4
    Issue number1/2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • research
    • cooperation
    • network
    • similarity
    • recommender systems
    • utility-based
    • utility
    • betweenness centrality

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'To whom and why should I connect? Co-author Recommendation based on powerful and similar Peers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this