Abstract
The present article offers preliminary outcomes of a user study that investigated the acceptance of a recommender system that suggests future co- authors for scientific article writing. The recommendation approach is twofold: network information (betweenness centrality) and author (keyword) similarity are used to compute the utility of peers in a network of co-authors. Two sets of recommendations were provided to the participants: Set one focused on all candidate authors, including co-authors of a target user to strengthen current bonds and strive for acceptance of a certain research topic. Set two focused on solely new co-authors of a target user to foster creativity, excluding current co- authors. A small-scale evaluation suggests that the utility-based recommendation approach is promising, but to maximize outcome, we need to 1) compensate for researchers’ interests that change over time, and 2) account for multi-person co-authored papers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 121-137 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (IJTEL) |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 1/2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- research
- cooperation
- network
- similarity
- recommender systems
- utility-based
- utility
- betweenness centrality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To whom and why should I connect? Co-author Recommendation based on powerful and similar Peers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver