Wethouders in de frontlijn: een studie naar de perceptie van en de omgang met persoonlijke bedreigingen

Diana Marijnissen, Emile Kolthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This contribution reports on a delimited part of a larger, exploratory study, the main question of which was: How do aldermen perceive threats, what are their behavioral intentions and what is the influence of threats on the process and the outcome of decision-making? This question was answered with the help of Q-methodology, semi-structured interviews and case studies. This article discusses the results of the Q-methodology and the semi-structured interviews. The case studies will be reported separately later on. Through the Q-methodology three patterns in perception were found in dealing with threats: ‘combative and decisive’, ‘vulnerable and thoughtful’ and ‘down-to-earth and accepting’. The interviews show that it usually concerns instrumental threats that are deliberately used to influence decision making, which usually take place in the private sphere and vary from verbal aggression to physical violence. Most threats come from individuals, but some come from groups, in some cases there is a relationship with criminals. In the cases reviewed, the consequences in the private sphere are far-reaching, there are indications for the influence on public functioning (from hardening to great caution). There is almost always a report, a fuss in the media can affect the authority of the official.
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)35 - 62
Number of pages26
JournalTijdschrift voor Veiligheid
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Keywords

  • threats in politics
  • Q-methodology
  • undue influence on politics
  • coping strategies

Cite this

@article{47743957390b40f6aa4993b28a71125c,
title = "Wethouders in de frontlijn: een studie naar de perceptie van en de omgang met persoonlijke bedreigingen",
abstract = "This contribution reports on a delimited part of a larger, exploratory study, the main question of which was: How do aldermen perceive threats, what are their behavioral intentions and what is the influence of threats on the process and the outcome of decision-making? This question was answered with the help of Q-methodology, semi-structured interviews and case studies. This article discusses the results of the Q-methodology and the semi-structured interviews. The case studies will be reported separately later on. Through the Q-methodology three patterns in perception were found in dealing with threats: ‘combative and decisive’, ‘vulnerable and thoughtful’ and ‘down-to-earth and accepting’. The interviews show that it usually concerns instrumental threats that are deliberately used to influence decision making, which usually take place in the private sphere and vary from verbal aggression to physical violence. Most threats come from individuals, but some come from groups, in some cases there is a relationship with criminals. In the cases reviewed, the consequences in the private sphere are far-reaching, there are indications for the influence on public functioning (from hardening to great caution). There is almost always a report, a fuss in the media can affect the authority of the official.",
keywords = "threats in politics, Q-methodology, undue influence on politics, coping strategies",
author = "Diana Marijnissen and Emile Kolthoff",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.5553/TvV/187279482018017003003",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "17",
pages = "35 -- 62",
journal = "Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid",
issn = "1872-7948",
number = "3",

}

Wethouders in de frontlijn : een studie naar de perceptie van en de omgang met persoonlijke bedreigingen. / Marijnissen, Diana; Kolthoff, Emile.

In: Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Vol. 17, No. 3, 12.2018, p. 35 - 62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wethouders in de frontlijn

T2 - een studie naar de perceptie van en de omgang met persoonlijke bedreigingen

AU - Marijnissen, Diana

AU - Kolthoff, Emile

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - This contribution reports on a delimited part of a larger, exploratory study, the main question of which was: How do aldermen perceive threats, what are their behavioral intentions and what is the influence of threats on the process and the outcome of decision-making? This question was answered with the help of Q-methodology, semi-structured interviews and case studies. This article discusses the results of the Q-methodology and the semi-structured interviews. The case studies will be reported separately later on. Through the Q-methodology three patterns in perception were found in dealing with threats: ‘combative and decisive’, ‘vulnerable and thoughtful’ and ‘down-to-earth and accepting’. The interviews show that it usually concerns instrumental threats that are deliberately used to influence decision making, which usually take place in the private sphere and vary from verbal aggression to physical violence. Most threats come from individuals, but some come from groups, in some cases there is a relationship with criminals. In the cases reviewed, the consequences in the private sphere are far-reaching, there are indications for the influence on public functioning (from hardening to great caution). There is almost always a report, a fuss in the media can affect the authority of the official.

AB - This contribution reports on a delimited part of a larger, exploratory study, the main question of which was: How do aldermen perceive threats, what are their behavioral intentions and what is the influence of threats on the process and the outcome of decision-making? This question was answered with the help of Q-methodology, semi-structured interviews and case studies. This article discusses the results of the Q-methodology and the semi-structured interviews. The case studies will be reported separately later on. Through the Q-methodology three patterns in perception were found in dealing with threats: ‘combative and decisive’, ‘vulnerable and thoughtful’ and ‘down-to-earth and accepting’. The interviews show that it usually concerns instrumental threats that are deliberately used to influence decision making, which usually take place in the private sphere and vary from verbal aggression to physical violence. Most threats come from individuals, but some come from groups, in some cases there is a relationship with criminals. In the cases reviewed, the consequences in the private sphere are far-reaching, there are indications for the influence on public functioning (from hardening to great caution). There is almost always a report, a fuss in the media can affect the authority of the official.

KW - threats in politics

KW - Q-methodology

KW - undue influence on politics

KW - coping strategies

U2 - 10.5553/TvV/187279482018017003003

DO - 10.5553/TvV/187279482018017003003

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 35

EP - 62

JO - Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid

JF - Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid

SN - 1872-7948

IS - 3

ER -