When are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner?

The moderating role of autonomy

J. Van Ruysseveldt, M. van Dijke

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Building on theoretical frameworks like the Job Demands Control model and Action Theory we tested whether the relationship between workload and employees' experiences of opportunities for workplace learning is of an inverted u-shaped nature and whether autonomy moderates this relationship. We predicted that – at moderate levels of autonomy – workload was positively associated with learning opportunities at low levels of workload, but negatively at high levels of workload. Also, we predicted that low autonomy prevents positive effects of moderate workload from materializing whereas high autonomy makes high workload less destructive to the learning process. Furthermore, we examined whether learning opportunities increase particularly as a function of higher matched levels of workload and autonomy and whether mismatch between workload and autonomy is particularly detrimental to the learning process. We found support for these ideas in two large and heterogeneous samples of working adults using moderated and polynomial regression analyses and subsequent response surface methodology. These results integrate conflicting prior findings and extend Karasek's (1979) active learning hypothesis. They also have clear implications for job redesign practices aiming to promote workplace learning opportunities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)470-483
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Vocational Behavior
    Volume79
    Issue number2
    Early online date5 Mar 2011
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

    Fingerprint

    Workload
    Workplace
    workload
    workplace
    autonomy
    Learning
    learning
    learning process
    action theory
    job demand
    Problem-Based Learning
    model theory
    Workplace learning
    Autonomy
    mismatch
    Regression Analysis
    employee
    regression
    methodology
    experience

    Keywords

    • Workplace learning
    • Job demands
    • Job demand-control model
    • Action theory
    • Response surface methodology

    Cite this

    @article{28a83114220548c0a2204c9221a3ee7b,
    title = "When are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner?: The moderating role of autonomy",
    abstract = "Building on theoretical frameworks like the Job Demands Control model and Action Theory we tested whether the relationship between workload and employees' experiences of opportunities for workplace learning is of an inverted u-shaped nature and whether autonomy moderates this relationship. We predicted that – at moderate levels of autonomy – workload was positively associated with learning opportunities at low levels of workload, but negatively at high levels of workload. Also, we predicted that low autonomy prevents positive effects of moderate workload from materializing whereas high autonomy makes high workload less destructive to the learning process. Furthermore, we examined whether learning opportunities increase particularly as a function of higher matched levels of workload and autonomy and whether mismatch between workload and autonomy is particularly detrimental to the learning process. We found support for these ideas in two large and heterogeneous samples of working adults using moderated and polynomial regression analyses and subsequent response surface methodology. These results integrate conflicting prior findings and extend Karasek's (1979) active learning hypothesis. They also have clear implications for job redesign practices aiming to promote workplace learning opportunities.",
    keywords = "Workplace learning, Job demands, Job demand-control model, Action theory, Response surface methodology",
    author = "{Van Ruysseveldt}, J. and {van Dijke}, M.",
    note = "IF = 2.80",
    year = "2011",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "79",
    pages = "470--483",
    journal = "Journal of Vocational Behavior",
    issn = "0001-8791",
    publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
    number = "2",

    }

    When are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy. / Van Ruysseveldt, J.; van Dijke, M.

    In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 79, No. 2, 10.2011, p. 470-483.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - When are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner?

    T2 - The moderating role of autonomy

    AU - Van Ruysseveldt, J.

    AU - van Dijke, M.

    N1 - IF = 2.80

    PY - 2011/10

    Y1 - 2011/10

    N2 - Building on theoretical frameworks like the Job Demands Control model and Action Theory we tested whether the relationship between workload and employees' experiences of opportunities for workplace learning is of an inverted u-shaped nature and whether autonomy moderates this relationship. We predicted that – at moderate levels of autonomy – workload was positively associated with learning opportunities at low levels of workload, but negatively at high levels of workload. Also, we predicted that low autonomy prevents positive effects of moderate workload from materializing whereas high autonomy makes high workload less destructive to the learning process. Furthermore, we examined whether learning opportunities increase particularly as a function of higher matched levels of workload and autonomy and whether mismatch between workload and autonomy is particularly detrimental to the learning process. We found support for these ideas in two large and heterogeneous samples of working adults using moderated and polynomial regression analyses and subsequent response surface methodology. These results integrate conflicting prior findings and extend Karasek's (1979) active learning hypothesis. They also have clear implications for job redesign practices aiming to promote workplace learning opportunities.

    AB - Building on theoretical frameworks like the Job Demands Control model and Action Theory we tested whether the relationship between workload and employees' experiences of opportunities for workplace learning is of an inverted u-shaped nature and whether autonomy moderates this relationship. We predicted that – at moderate levels of autonomy – workload was positively associated with learning opportunities at low levels of workload, but negatively at high levels of workload. Also, we predicted that low autonomy prevents positive effects of moderate workload from materializing whereas high autonomy makes high workload less destructive to the learning process. Furthermore, we examined whether learning opportunities increase particularly as a function of higher matched levels of workload and autonomy and whether mismatch between workload and autonomy is particularly detrimental to the learning process. We found support for these ideas in two large and heterogeneous samples of working adults using moderated and polynomial regression analyses and subsequent response surface methodology. These results integrate conflicting prior findings and extend Karasek's (1979) active learning hypothesis. They also have clear implications for job redesign practices aiming to promote workplace learning opportunities.

    KW - Workplace learning

    KW - Job demands

    KW - Job demand-control model

    KW - Action theory

    KW - Response surface methodology

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 79

    SP - 470

    EP - 483

    JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior

    JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior

    SN - 0001-8791

    IS - 2

    ER -