When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science?

Raoul Beunen*, Paul Opdam

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

49 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

A key issue of scientific research is the impact of science in landscape planning. Two trends in society demand this issue to be a research priority: the decentralization of government power to the local level and the growing distrust towards experts and scientific knowledge in policy and the public. We show how these trends challenge the role and position of science in landscape planning. We conclude that it is urgent to systematically extend our knowledge on the impact of science in decision-making networks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-326
Number of pages3
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume100
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Science-practice nexus
  • Governmental decentralization
  • Coproduction of knowledge
  • Credibility of science
  • INFORMATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this