Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders: Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard

N. Mahadevan*, A.P. Gregg, C. Sedikides, W. De Waal-Andrews

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.
Original languageEnglish
Article number334
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume7
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Assertiveness
Narcissism
Self Concept
Anxiety
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression
Psychology

Keywords

  • hierometer theory
  • sociometer theory
  • status
  • inclusion
  • self-regard
  • self-esteem
  • narcissism
  • assertiveness

Cite this

Mahadevan, N., Gregg, A. P., Sedikides, C., & De Waal-Andrews, W. (2016). Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders: Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-19. [334].
Mahadevan, N. ; Gregg, A.P. ; Sedikides, C. ; De Waal-Andrews, W. / Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders : Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 7. pp. 1-19.
@article{db26fb041e68495d9f343d2da1177c94,
title = "Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders: Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard",
abstract = "What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.",
keywords = "hierometer theory, sociometer theory, status, inclusion, self-regard, self-esteem, narcissism, assertiveness",
author = "N. Mahadevan and A.P. Gregg and C. Sedikides and {De Waal-Andrews}, W.",
note = "exported from refbase (http://publicaties.ou.nl/show.php?record=1910), last updated on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 09:39:57 +0100",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "30",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Mahadevan, N, Gregg, AP, Sedikides, C & De Waal-Andrews, W 2016, 'Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders: Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard', Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, 334, pp. 1-19.

Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders : Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard. / Mahadevan, N.; Gregg, A.P.; Sedikides, C.; De Waal-Andrews, W.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, 334, 30.03.2016, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders

T2 - Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard

AU - Mahadevan, N.

AU - Gregg, A.P.

AU - Sedikides, C.

AU - De Waal-Andrews, W.

N1 - exported from refbase (http://publicaties.ou.nl/show.php?record=1910), last updated on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 09:39:57 +0100

PY - 2016/3/30

Y1 - 2016/3/30

N2 - What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.

AB - What evolutionary function does self-regard serve? Hierometer theory, introduced here, provides one answer: it helps individuals navigate status hierarchies, which feature zero-sum contests that can be lost as well as won. In particular, self-regard tracks social status to regulate behavioral assertiveness, augmenting or diminishing it to optimize performance in such contests. Hierometer theory also offers a conceptual counterpoint that helps resolve ambiguities in sociometer theory, which offers a complementary account of self-regard’s evolutionary function. In two large-scale cross-sectional studies, we operationalized theoretically relevant variables at three distinct levels of analysis, namely, social (relations: status, inclusion), psychological (self-regard: self-esteem, narcissism), and behavioral (strategy: assertiveness, affiliativeness). Correlational and mediational analyses consistently supported hierometer theory, but offered only mixed support for sociometer theory, including when controlling for confounding constructs (anxiety, depression). We interpret our results in terms of a broader agency-communion framework.

KW - hierometer theory

KW - sociometer theory

KW - status

KW - inclusion

KW - self-regard

KW - self-esteem

KW - narcissism

KW - assertiveness

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 334

ER -

Mahadevan N, Gregg AP, Sedikides C, De Waal-Andrews W. Winners, Losers, Insiders, and Outsiders: Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer Theories of Self-Regard. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 Mar 30;7:1-19. 334.