Abstract
By using the Design Science Research Methodology a method-agnostic, card-based artefact, i.e. design probe for guiding the embeddedness of fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems (ADM’s) is created on literature groundings, envisioning a sociotechnical approach. The motive is originated in the practitioners’ call for guidance, in the shape of light-weight, integrable tools which address (un)fairness in ADM-design. This tool, so called responsible AI:CEID quartet, is demonstrated by using several cards, during a workshop within a single ADM-developers organization, while reflecting upon an artificial Hiring-case founded by Princeton. Elements of Value Sensitive Design, Critical System Heuristics, and the Organizational Justice Theory are incorporated in the card deck to ensure a sociotechnical, and by these means contextual approach in fairness.Evaluation on perceived usefulness reveals that although the extensive checklist it represents is warmly welcomed, there are several suggested add-ons, and improvement-points for a reiteration in design. Implementing organizational roles, nuancing the fairness-norms used, and including actionpoints in the form of scenario based hints, are examples of these. A follow-up study could implement these improvements, evolving and maturing the artefact, so the artefact may be of practical value in the future.
Date of Award | 30 Nov 2022 |
---|---|
Original language | English |
Supervisor | Laury Bollen (Examiner) & Tim Huygh (Co-assessor) |
Keywords
- Algorithmic Decision-making Systems
- Fairness-by-Design
- AI-Fairness
- Machine Learning
- Design Science Research
- Sociotechnical Approach
- Value Sensitive Design
- Artefact
- Bias Mitigation
- CSH
Master's Degree
- Master Business Process management & IT (BPMIT)